@pmisch said in Documentation improvement DHCPv6 prefix delegation:
Your example wastes 15 times /60 i.e. FF10 to FFF0.
Huh.. They are showing you could use a "range" of your space in this case 1 of the /52 of your /48 and use to to delegate /60s to clients... So you could have what 256 clients that all get /60 delegated to them.
Could it be worded a bit better.. Maybe they could call out that your taking the
fc07:1010:1010:f000::/52
Which breaks down to 16 /56
fc07:1010:1010:f000::/56
fc07:1010:1010:f100::/56
fc07:1010:1010:f200::/56
<snip>
fc07:1010:1010:fe00::/56
fc07:1010:1010:ff00::/56
And using that for delegations of /60s
I think they just showing that you could take a range of the the last 16 of the /56's your /48 break up into and using them to delegate /60
When the docs were only on the wiki, pretty much anyone that asked and was given permission could edit.. But we can call in a few guys to see about documentation edits/enhancements..
Any thoughts on this @chrismacmahon, what is the proper way to have documentation reviewed for clarity? And possible revision? @jimp or @Derelict ?
