Quantcast
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 8

Reply to Documentation improvement DHCPv6 prefix delegation on Sat, 27 Jul 2019 17:23:31 GMT

@johnpoz
Building 16 times /56 at first sounds reasonable to me as this assumption is still valid with what the documentation suggests.
So we assume that FC07:1010:1010:F000::/52 is being reserved for 256 times /60 prefixes which is
1st: fc07:1010:1010:f000/60
...
256th: fc07:1010:1010:fff0/60

So the logical conclusion is to enter fc07:1010:1010:fff0 as this is the last network than can be handed out by Prefix Delegation.

@Derelict said in Documentation improvement DHCPv6 prefix delegation:

or FC07:1010:1010:F000:: to FC07:1010:1010:FFF0:: (256 /60s)

I prefer this one because it seems like a common thing to me to go from 1 x /48 to 16 times /52 to 256 times /60 when you slice your /48.


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 8

Trending Articles